Why NYSCOSS couldn’t stay silent on the Nationwide Research Initiative
NYSCOSS Executive Director Dr. Chuck Dedrick on why New York joined the AASA x ThoughtExchange Nationwide Research Initiative, and what pilots in Windsor and Brighton found.
At first, Dr. Chuck Dedrick said no.
When the AASA x ThoughtExchange Nationwide Research Initiative came to the New York State Council of School Superintendents (NYSCOSS), its Executive Director didn’t originally plan for New York to take part.
But he changed his mind.
Speaking to superintendents at the NYSCOSS 2026 Fall Leadership Summit in Saratoga Springs, Dr. Dedrick explained why he changed course and what New York’s districts found.
In this Article
- Why New York changed its mind (video 1:01)
- Pilot tested in two very different New York districts (video 2:24)
Why Did New York Join the AASA x ThoughtExchange Nationwide Research Initiative?
“I want to make sure that the voices of New York superintendents, New York schools, and New York communities had a voice.”
Dr. Chuck Dedrick’s reason for joining wasn’t about the research design or the technology. It was about what would be missing if New York stayed out.
New York is not a small voice to leave out. Dr. Dedrick noted that the state has more AASA members than any other, and NYSCOSS represents more than 800 members. His goal is for “as many voices as possible” to be heard.
A conversation about public education that doesn’t include your community will still produce conclusions. They just won’t reflect the people you serve.
Pilot tested in two very different New York districts
Before inviting districts statewide, the approach was pilot tested in two New York school districts: Windsor Central School District, led by Superintendent Jason Andrews, and Brighton Central School District, led by Superintendent Dr. Kevin McGowan.
“Two districts that could not be more different,” Dr. Dedrick said.
The communities are different. So are the superintendents. In both, he noted, the pilot was successful and gave each district “a lot of good information.”
An approach that works in one kind of district is useful. An approach that holds up in two very different ones is worth a closer look.
Watch Dr. Chuck Dedrick’s full remarks above to hear more.