5 Effective Group Decision-Making Techniques
Collecting diverse opinions and perspectives to inform decision-making is essential. When decisions affect many people across an organization, group decision-making techniques can better involve, engage, and motivate people, making outcomes more likely to succeed.
This blog post explores the pros and cons of group decision-making and describes five common techniques to help leaders build successful decision-making processes.
What is Group Decision-Making?
Advantages of Group Decision-Making
- Generate buy-in from stakeholders by involving them from the beginning
- Build consensus by inclusively considering the pros and cons of each option
- Encourage workplace creativity by surfacing ideas from any individual or team, not just leadership or internal subject matter experts
- Create more favorable business outcomes by sharing decision-making responsibilities with everyone
Disadvantages of Group Decision-Making
- Trivialize or replace high-priority tasks with lower priority tasks, resulting in collective procrastination
- Diffuse accountability throughout the entire group, thereby avoiding responsibility for poor outcomes
- Create inefficient groups that struggle to focus on the big picture and go off on tangents
- Contribute to “groupthink” where group members reach a consensus without critically evaluating alternative viewpoints (usually caused by a desire for conformity and/or conflict avoidance)
5 Techniques for Effective Group Decision-Making
1. The RAPID Framework
Bain and Company’s RAPID Decision-Making Model can help organizations make better decisions when multiple stakeholders are involved. RAPID clarifies decision accountability.
Each letter in the word RAPID signifies a group member’s role during the decision-making process. According to Bain and Company, when roles are clearly delineated in this way, groups make the right choices swiftly and effectively.
It’s important to note that not every decision merits the level of effort and investment that goes into creating explicit RAPID roles. Nonetheless, RAPID is a useful framework for larger decisions.
The RAPID model requires practice and discipline. In an ideal world, the model should be built into the company culture and well-understood by everyone from the top down.
2. The Nominal Group Technique
The Nominal Group Technique (NGT) relies on a moderator who records ideas produced during a group or individual brainstorming session. Group members discuss their ideas with the moderator, who compiles a list of all the ideas.
Participants or a panel of decision-makers then vote using index cards numbered one through five. The numbers correspond to the priority the idea should receive. The votes are then calculated and ideas pursued in order of the priority score they received.
3. The Delphi Technique
The Delphi Technique is similar to NGT but instead of in-person discussion, it relies on questionnaires to gather information and insights from a group of anonymous individuals.
The questionnaires are delivered in rounds and the questions in each round are determined by the responses from the round before. Starting in the second round, participants rank the ideas presented by order of priority. The questions grow progressively more focused on a small subset of ideas on which the leaders make a decision.
4. Decision-engineering process
Step 1: Frame the decision
Step 2: Generating alternatives
Step 3: Decide the course of action
5. Discussion Management with ThoughtExchange
The ThoughtExchange platform collects anonymous responses that participants vote on objectively, similarly to NGT and Delphi techniques. Employees can present suggestions and solutions throughout the decision-making process and vote on their favorites without anyone knowing which answer comes from which team member.
With this technology-powered approach, the focus remains firmly on the validity and quality of the ideas and insights—not on the person who presented them. In this way, leaders make decisions solely based on their content and value, without any unconscious bias and no time wasted on office politics or fruitless debates.
Improving the Group Decision-Making Process
1. Involve all employees
Leaders who figure out an effective group decision-making process can tap into the power of the collective while engaging employees, making them feel valued and less likely to check out or leave the company.
Employee involvement in the decision-making process shows those across the organization that their opinion is valued and trusted. It helps workers feel less like cogs in a machine and more like experts and consultants in their respective areas of expertise. Employees can clearly see that they can make a difference, contribute to the organization, and are empowered to do so on a more regular basis.
2. Keep it anonymous
3. Beware non-proven techniques
4. Share collective responsibility for the outcome
All members should feel accountable for the decision and its outcome. To ensure this, ask the team to sign a responsibility statement at the outset, agreeing to accept the collective decision. This can balance the power in the group and create a more open idea exchange.
Interested in learning more about how ThoughtExchange can facilitate effective group decision-making? Download this white paper on Enterprise Discussion Management and see how organizations like McDonalds, RBC, Oracle NetSuite, and GE Healthcare are using it to inform better decisions every day.